Showing posts with label IPL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPL. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 July 2009

From nurturing horses, criminals, cricketers....and what more??


Horse Race: Turf Club : Horses::Cricket: Stadium : Players!...makes for a pretty good analogy, isn't it ?.

Notwithstanding the shifting of the Bangalore Turf Club to the city's outskirts, the launch of "KPL" or the Karnataka Premier League is proving to be the ideal replacement. With a total of eight teams likely to be owned by filmstars, movie production houses, underworld dons and politicians the league provides them with a great breeding ground for establishing a wider base in the state, not to mention all the betting, gambling that comes along.

While the relocation of the turf club comes as a disappointment to many, for some the KPL comes as a blessing to make more money, catapult growth of unscrupulous elements, all in the name of 'CRICKET'. It doesn't come as much of a surprise with Anil Kumble making his displeasure evident. Kumble has a point when he says the league will encourage lot of backdoor entry. The former captain is spot on. From betting on horses to cricketers, the action from the Bangalore Turf club shifts a few miles down to the M.Chinnaswamy Stadium.

With two teams from Bangalore, six teams from mofussil's and media coverage the stakes are high. Another point Kumble makes is about the modest pay caps on players and the overall format. With each association getting an annual grant from the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India), the K.S.C.A (Karnataka State Cricket Association) certainly has the wherewithal to run a tournament, develop the game throughout the state on its own terms. If at all the state association believes it lacks the marketing abilities, it could have brought in expertise from professional sports management firms like IMG, develop a business model and take the game forward.

Over the years Karnataka cricket has seen the greatest of cricketers represent the country. Its hypocritical when all those bidding for these teams vouch for the game's developement. And it surely doesn't require a KPL to be held to foster talents. Encouraging elements for whom the game, it's players and the development is of least priority would be the last thing that cricket needed. But at the end of the day it boils down to business.

For the player's, with instant success, fame and money through the IPL's (Indian Premier League) and KPL's the desire and motivation to play for their state teams, Ranji Trophy and the longer version of the game is sure to take a beating. And the signs are ominous. Hope sanity prevails.

Owners bidding for teams include :

Upendra, Ramya, Sudeep, Rockline Venkatesh (actors & producers), Muthappa Rai (underworld don-turned-politician), Sriramulu (Minister), Ambareesh (actor&politician), industrialist Jagannath Y, politician Jayprakash Hegde and educational group Jain Group of institutions.

Likely team owners

Friday, 22 May 2009

India's political and cricket fortunes

Well, the events that unfolded over the last few weeks have been quite invigorating, bit like a roller-coaster ride. It couldn't have been better with the IPL happening both on and off the field (Indian Premier League & the Indian Political League).

Firstly, the uncertainty over any sort of clear majority in the Loksabha elections was palpable. The IPL in South Africa was pretty much similar. For, almost 6 teams jostled for a place in the top four to make it through to the semi-finals. Like the Congress and BJP which formed the fulcrum in their respective alliances (UPA & NDA) with numerous smaller parties revolving around, the Delhi Daredevils and Chennai Superkings were probably the big players on field with the rest beating around the bush trying to have their share of pie.

The mandate looked to be clearly divided with no clear winner emerging. So much so, that the leaders from relatively smaller parties like Mayawati, Sharad Pawar nursed ambitions to become the Prime Minister. While the BSP's and NCP's ebbed away, the resurgence of Royal Challengers and Deccan chargers is a distinctive part between the elections and cricket with the underdogs emerging victorious.For Royal Challenger's the road to the top has been a challenging one especially to stage a comeback after four loses. A testament of the team's will to succeed despite all odds.

The last three matches (Royals Vs KKR, KingsXI Vs Superkings and Royal Challengers Vs Deccan Chargers) were almost like the days before the counting on May 16 with no winners in sight and every party bargaining with every other party in town. While the Royals went down without a fight against the battered Knightriders, KingsXI despite losing to Chennai seemed to be in contention for the semi-finals provided the Royal Challengers lost by huge margins. For Kings XI to make it to the top four, required Deccan Chargers to chase a total of 170 by 11.2 overs, which was quite unlikely.

On the field the wait and the anticipation finally ended with the Royal Challengers joining Daredevils, Deccan and Superkings. At last the points table looked as stable as the people's mandate for the Congress and its allies. Of course, the aftermath was evident with the market shooting up 2000 points like the upsurge of the Royal Challengers. An upsurge that wasn't serendipitous.

With the party's and teams having made and shown great promises it remains to seen if they have the wherewithal to deliver when it really matters.

Friday, 15 May 2009

IPL is more International




The critics wrote it off, the former cricketer's disliked the shorter format and some believed the city based culture was hard to establish given the nationalistic sentiment about the game in India. By and large there were more skeptics than an optimistic audience.

But the IPL took off with a bang, with a hope to nurture young Indian cricketers giving them an opportunity one could never ever fathom about - sharing the same dressing room with the connoisseurs of the game or effecting a run chase with Sachin Tendulkar or setting a field in consultation with Adam Gilchrist or a keeper saying "Common Warney" when Shane Warne is about to bowl! The IPL was a boon that began with a boom, no doubt.

Now in the middle of the second leg of the IPL one wonders if the IPL has actually had one of its objective fulfilled, which is to have some fine young prospects forming the back bone of Indian cricket. With 8 teams and over 60 Indian players, the percentage of an Indian prospect outshining a player of international repute is very negligible. Barring a few like Ravindra Jadeja, Shadab Jakati, Abhishek Nayar, Rajat Bhatia and Pradeep Sangwan the rest of the chunk has failed to create any considerable impact.

Time and again the onus has been on the established players to either make or break the game. While the IPL was expected to have some young talent shining through amidst the galaxy of stars, its still players like Hayden, Gilchrist, Tendulkar and Warne who continue to reign.

The game against Mumbai and Royals (May 14th) was an example of the inability of the Indian talent to take responsibility and perform. The idea of sending Yogesh Takawale and Rahane up the order before Sachin and Jayasurya backfired. Eventually it was upto Sachin to help resurrect Mumbai Indians. The Royal Challenger's, Bangalore have been largely dependent on the experience of Anil Kumble while the likes of Robin Uthappa, Karan Sharma, Rajesh Bishnoi haven't delivered as expected. Similarly, Chennai SuperKings have been doing well, thanks to Matthew Hayden and Delhi with AB De Villiers and Dirk Nannes. And for Punjab its a certain Yusuf Abdulla from SouthAfrica.

While a few performances have been heartening, its the international players who have been the kingmakers of the IPL. However the experience of being the subordinates amidst all the master's is sure to keep them in good stead. And with a hope they will rule one fine day.

Batting
ML Hayden -> 486(Runs)

AC Gilchrist -> 329(Runs)

SK Raina -> 322(Runs)

AB de Villiers -> 315(Runs)

SR Tendulkar -> 307(Runs)

JP Duminy -> 301(Runs)

Bowling
SL Malinga ->16 (Wkts)

RP Singh -> 16 (Wkts)

A Nehra -> 15 (Wkts)

YA Abdulla ->14 (Wkts)

SK Warne -> 14 (Wkts)

A Kumble -> 13 (Wkts)

Monday, 22 September 2008

Cricketing Apartheid

"It's nothing but a form of apartheid when the board dictates that you can play with X but not with Y.", Kapil Dev was quoted as saying referring to harsh treatment of ICL players by the BCCI.

Clearly some strong words by the legendary all-rounder expressing his displeasure over the standoff between the BCCI and the ICL or the rebel league. It doesn't come as a surprise when decisions taken by the BCCI, more often that not seem extremely immature. There seems to be no respite in the board's bitterness towards the ICL ever since its inception.

While the BCCI chances upon every opportunity to cold shoulder the ICL, the players in its own backyard aren't spared either. It was nothing short of a shocker when the BCCI decided to preclude the participation of its players (V.V.S Laxman, Piyush Chawla and Ajit Agarkar) in the English county circuit involving ICL players. This stance by the board whose sole objective lies in improving the game and provide support to its players is devoid of any logic and commonsense.

Over the years world cricket has been witness to the inability and inefficiency of its governing body (ICC) to take tough stands on its member associations and in tackling issues especially on the game's richest board. There is little doubt over BCCI's hegemony in world cricket. However, it does not have any morality in initiating decisions that could hinder the game or its players. To say the ICL is an "unrecognized" format of the game - is just a subterfuge. With the second season due to begin, one would expect to see the ICL fight for its recognition with the ICC or in the courts with some vigor. A lot of questions continue to remain unanswered and the answer is quite simple. If soccer can have different leagues in one nation then why not cricket?

To forbid players from playing based on such reasons seems just irrelevant clearly indicative of a restriction in freedom of movement which wouldn't stand in the court of law. Over the years soccer and handball have had similar issues eventually impacting world sport. One such case was by Belgium player Jean-Marc Bosman. Bosman’s contract with Belgium club side RFC Liege had run out and he wanted to be transferred to French club Dunkerque. RFC Liege, however, refused to let Bosman leave without the payment of a transfer fee which Dunkerque were unwilling to pay. Bosman claimed that as a European Union citizen, he possessed the right to "freedom of movement" within the European Union if he wished to.

Another case that had a major impact was the ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) involving a Slovakian handball player Maros Kolpak. Kolpak was employed as a professional by a German second division team. As a national of a then non-European Economic Area (EEA) state, Kolpak was not considered by the German regulator to qualify for the benefits emergent from the decision in Bosman case. On this basis the Handballbund club limited the number of non-EEA nationals which a team could field in any one professional fixture. Kolpak suggested that an association agreement between Slovakia and the European Union entitled him to be treated in the same manner as an EEA national as regards treatment once in employment.

The implications of the above cases were largely significant and one among them was the "quota system", that limited the number of foreigners in a team was illegal. This decision augured well for the players and EPL teams such as Arsenal and Chelsea. Meanwhile the debate ceases to rest either within the ECB (England & Wales cricket board)on the Kolpak issue (dual nationality) in county cricket or the FIFA, suggesting for a "6+5" proposal (6 national & 5 foreign players in a team) which if implemented is certain to be challenged again by the EU Law and the ECJ which prohibits any discrimination based on nationality.

Cricket unlike soccer is not a ubiquitous sport restricting itself to a handful of countries. Until very recently, county cricket in the U.K was the only professional format which recruited foreign players to enhance the domestic competition. However unlike soccer cricketing nations thrive on the success of its national teams. And with not enough money in the domestic circuit, for the players a stint with a county team in England meant - great experience in enhancing skills and a sense of financial security. However with mounting broadcast rights, sponsors and new leagues like IPL and ICL cropping up the players are in a better position unlike the ones in the past.

The ICL however has reasons to be optimistic having found some support with the England and Srilanka cricket boards. The Lankan board's decision to allow its rebel players to participate in their domestic competition's might have made the BCCI crimson with embarrassment. Specially coming from a senior statesman like Arjuna Ranatunga who heads Srilankan cricket and regarded as an individual responsible for Srilanka's cricketing renaissance makes it all the more significant.

The ICL certainly has its limitations which probably doesn't align with the BCCI's objectives and the way it functions. Country representation, selection issues are some concerns. But to treat the rebel league and its representatives as pariah is setting a sad example. If the BCCI has any objections with the rebel league it has to take it up on a different platform. It's high time cricket had its own Bosman's and Kolpak's to fight against the system and get rid of the monopoly of the board's on its players.

An article by Simon Boyes from the Nottingham Law School clearly sums it up - "It ensures that sporting institutions have the power to promote a sport in a manner which they consider to be the most consistent with their objectives, provided that their choices do not give rise to discrimination or conceal the pursuit of economic interests."

At the end of the day one has to realize that an average sports persons' career lasts for not more than 5-6 years. Very few manage to be at the peak consistently and it only makes sense to maximize the opportunities in the short span. To deprive them of their bread and butter would be insane.

Thursday, 22 May 2008

IPL Fan Loyalty and Mumbai's partial crowd

It was one of the most thrilling matches so far in the IPL and the Mumbai crowd certainly had their moneys worth.A last ball,last wicket runout and a game perfectly scripted for T20 that went down till the wire, ending up with the Kings Punjab eventually winning, who looked defeated until Sachin Tendulkar's dismissal.For Mumbai Indians it wasn't a game they deserved to lose considering the stiff competition on the top of the league table sans the Rajasthan Royals.

While the over 20,000 Wankhede crowd had reasons to feel let down, throughout the match the support for the hometeam was unconditional not to mention that it was thoroughly onesided, booing the Punjab players.At the post match presentation Yuvraj Singh made his displesure evident indicating the "crowd was partial" and that the guests had a host of players like himself, Sreesanth and others who represent the country and deserved to be appreciated.This wasn't the first of its kind though.The IPL has already been witness to similar instances when Rahul Dravid was surprised on not being lauded after scoring a boundary in Mumbai and Sehwag literally begging for an applause in Hyderabad.

While Yuvraj might have made his intentions clear like Sehwag and Dravid did earlier, these were clearly signs of what the IPL had in the offing to which the Mumbai fans would testify to.The Punjab captain's complaint for once defies logic, certainly the IPL logic.Wasn't this expected when IPL started on similar lines as the EPL(English Premier League) - Growing city based loyalties? As for the debates surrounding the IPL in terms of the fans apprehenson towards supporting their favourite stars or the city based franchise, the match against Punjab and Mumbai was testimonial to what the future holds for IPL in terms of the fan's loyalty.

Scenes like these are a new experience to the cricketers who otherwise witness great support when representing the country.But soon they would also need to realise that the league has a flavour of its own or one which is expected to build over the coming years and that the players not being appreciated playing away from home should not be a cause for concern.On the contrary the franchise owners would be smiling all the way for it has provided them with better opportunities to reach out to its niche audience and reap greater returns on their huge investments.

Afterall how often do we see a Steven Gerrard or a Lampard booed by the "English fans" at the Theatre of Dreams in the English premier league who otherwise get exceptional fan support playing at the Euro2008 or a Christiano Ronaldo welcomed back at Manchester United after a verbal dual with Wayne Rooney at the 2006Worldcup.The IPL fan loyalty will take its time to be as definitive as the EPL or a champions league.With such a dream start to its maiden venture the IPL slowly and steadily has all the makings to catch up with the best in the world.

Cheers,
Karthik.